Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Human morality Essay
Morality has often been associated with the roles performed by the opinion of nature and nurture in relation to the source of moral dispositions. It has been expressed that evolution has endured benignant creations preconditions of religion, yet it is altogether during engagement with an privates goal that these preconditions argon converted to pure morality. growing considers adult male beings as one of the wight species and thus it is not easy and b be(a) to detach ourselves from the rest of the other(a) biological species in terms of our morals and conducts (Crawford and Salmon, 2004).The impression of morality is thus not an demand part of being merciful, but its movement makes us adjust to our environments, as headspring as act in a rational panache. Morality besides allows human beings to c are for other individuals, as closely as experience the opinioning of scatty something. More importantly, morality provides us an additional characteristicto want t o be tolerable individuals. There has been signifi sack upt debate with regards to the implications of morality and that of the design of evolution coined by Charles Darwin.It has been depict in the history of Social Darwinism and the concept of eugenics that it is possible to choose which genes should further proliferation in the next generations and those genes that confer undesirable traits be left out to go nonexistent in the human race. This concept of eugenics has been essay in eradicating future generations of criminals as nearly as sickly individuals that carry patrimonial medical disorders.Unfortunately, morality is also influenced by the concept of Social Darwinism, wherein there is gigantic mistaking of the theory of evolution, especially that of the concept of fitness. One major issue of misinterpretation is that the followers of Social Darwinism powerfully equalise the word good to the condition of being highly create by mental actd. Hence any individuals tha t are not behaving in a licit manner such as criminals are immediately classified as individuals that die to a lower level in the taxonomy of human evolution.This concept should thus be revisited so that the term fitness be only associated with physical fitness of an organism as it evolves through time. It should also be knget that the fitness of an organism is strongly influenced by an environment, wherein an organism that lives in a harsh environment learns to survive in cruel ecological conditions, and in the contingency of human beings, in poor loving and environmental conditions.Moral dispositions among human beings evolve through the process of natural selection, indeed the results of evolution are simply considered to be that of the selfish trait. It is generally accepted that the human brain is comprised of structures that have evolved to follow that either-or way of thinking, wherein the mind is put in a blank non-thinking conditions and the rest of the functions of th e brain are at an innate condition.There are also some genetic misinterpretations with regards to human nature, wherein there is so much maintenance on the transmission of intelligence and other superb human capabilities that is known be better understood that there is also a concept of determinism wherein an individual carries this expect to be compassionate to other individuals because they feel a certain peace and tranquility in their bodies, including the brain and the heart. Thus there is an interaction between the environmental and the genes of an individual, resulting in the personality of an individual to sacrifice his own benefits for the good of others.The concept of eugenics thus can not be fully apply to human morality because this concept is stirred by multiple factors, mainly by the genetic makeup of the individual, as swell up as the environmental effects on the physiological brainwork of an individual. Thus, it is very simple for an individual to refrain from s tealing even if he is aware that stealing will provide him a source of funds for himself. reference Crawford C and Salmon C (eds. ). (2004) evolutionary Psychology, Public Policy and Personal Decisions. Mahwah, immature Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.